Step aside [url=http://plugins.b2evolution.net/index.php/2006/10/10/youtube_plugin]YouTube[/url]. Eat my dust [url=http://plugins.b2evolution.net/index.php/2006/08/25/autoblog_plugin_for_1_8]Autoblog[/url]. [url=http://plugins.b2evolution.net/index.php/2006/10/05/star_rating]StarRating[/url]: you just lost your star. As of this very moment a tiny little plugin named [url=http://plugins.b2evolution.net/index.php/2007/01/06/acrolink_plugin]AcroLink[/url] has surpassed all other plugins in terms of "star rating" score.

I TOTALLY RULE THE PLUGGED IN WORLD!!!!!

Or maybe not. I mean, I'm trusting StarRating to give me this little platform to stand on, and my plugin isn't really all that new or exciting. To be honest all I did, and I pretty much say so in the credits in the code, is to fit Isaac's original autoacro plugin to the new plugin architecture. I gave it a bell and a whistle and a gizmo here and there, but it's got a lot of 'problems' in terms of code. For example if you link to rqtertqetqwerqwer it'll act like that's okay. No sanity checking of any kind? Yup - it takes what you say as Werd. Further, it's got a 3.9 compared to a 3.8 for the other plugins I mentioned; plugins who happen to have, on average, 5 times the votes acrolink has. Nonetheless for this exact moment I'm going to pretend it matters and preen a bit.

MY PLUGINS ARE AWESOME IN THEIR UNMATCHEDNESS!!!

Is that a word? Unmatchedness? It sounds like a word so I'll pretend it is.

ALL OTHER PLUGINS BOW DOWN BEFORE MY PLUGINYNESS!

Sorry folks, but if you had a minor grade hack that happened to (briefly) get better ratings than youtube and autoblog wouldn't you pump up the moment?