1 edb Jun 12, 2006 00:50
3 nealo Jun 25, 2006 15:32
Ed,
I put it in on 9.1 and it is functioning as planned ... now I'm hoping the spammers will leave me alone for a bit. Thanks-
4 laibcoms Jun 30, 2006 09:26
others who tried, is it working effectively??
Thanks.
(just dont have time left to do testing... preparing to go to hong kong for my new work)
5 edb Jul 01, 2006 11:02
You're not doing the testing: I did. It worked completely. Proof is the continual trackback spam I'm getting now that I 'upgraded' and don't have this hack in place. Which makes more sense: spammers decided to target me at the exact moment that I decided to upgrade, or, I defeated their plans with a (reasonably simple) hack?
6 nealo Jul 05, 2006 16:15
Just an update - this hack works like a charm. Haven't had a single trackback spam hit since I changed it and the ability to update on demand in the backoffice just makes it that much easier to prevent trackback spammers.
Also, I changed the default lingo "Trackback to this address" to simply "Track it" as I found some people were searching for that specific phrase. I don't know if those folks were spammers, but better safe than sorry.
Thanks again EdB.
7 rossputin Jul 10, 2006 02:21
I installed this hack, but I was wondering if I should expect it to work for permalink names that are created from the post title rather than a number.
thanks much!
8 nealo Jul 10, 2006 04:38
Got a couple one or two-time trackbacks from spammers this weekend - this was shortly after changing the first/last parts of the hexaspammer. In both cases, they were mostly a bunch of jibberish. I'm wondering if some spammers tried and failed because of the hexaspammer and then just out of spite did a couple one-off trackback spams. Probably not, but I can't figure it out.
Still a great hack, of course.
9 laibcoms Jul 10, 2006 12:17
hmm... same. if the other trackback-spams are still getting through, then I safely say this anti-trackback-spam was defeated.... sadly.
it did work, trackback-spamming lessen to about 50% which is great, but the other spammers found a way...
I think they are reading the anti-spam here in the forums.
10 nealo Jul 10, 2006 16:02
I wouldn't wave the white flag yet - for me, it's only been a couple of randoms getting through (literally, two at different times). So we'll see ...
11 edb Jul 10, 2006 16:13
EdB wrote:
Sooner or later the spammers will have a version of your trackback ID that actually translates to a real post. As soon as that happens you should ban/delete/report the spammer via the antispam central feature AND change either your preceding character, or your following character, or both.
Did you think I said that because I didn't know what I was talking about?
ALL spammers use indexed information to nail you. Referer spammers nail you by finding key words and phrases that tells them "this is a b2evolution blog". They google those key words is the thing. Comment and trackback spammers have to find a post ID (or two or three or ten) that has a trackback URL on it in order to spam. So let me repeat myself:
EdB wrote:
Sooner or later the spammers will have a version of your trackback ID that actually translates to a real post. As soon as that happens you should ban/delete/report the spammer via the antispam central feature AND change either your preceding character, or your following character, or both.
You install the hack, it works. Eventually a spammer gets through. You change either your leading or your trailing (or both) characters, it works again.
Guess what you do when they get through again?
12 nealo Jul 10, 2006 19:40
EdB - have you had any trackback spams like I was referring to above? They were one-offs in my case, which led me to believe that some spammer searched for a keyword (like you were saying) and then tried to spam my blog, failed, and then got pissed and did a one-off trackback spam out of spite... yeah probably not what really happened, but I can't explain it any other way as I had changed the hexaspammer digits the night before I got the single spam attack ... so it was too soon for Google to have cached it.
13 edb Jul 11, 2006 00:31
When I had the hack installed I had no spams, but since upgrading to 1.8 beta I get lots of them. Some are 'normal' spams, some are the gibberish spams. BTW there is a thread about [url=http://forums.b2evolution.net/viewtopic.php?t=8349]the gibberish spam problem[/url] but since I'm seeing it on trackbacks there is no email ID to try to block. Haven't re-hacked it yet.
Oopsie! Found a flaw in this hack and corrected it above. If you have "use extra-path info" checked then the trackback ID got figured out by this bit:
The problem is that intval won't like your hexadecimal version, so it'll never work. The solution was to replace that bit with this:
NOW I'll be able to tell how long it takes the spammers to grab a trackback URL with this hack applied. If it takes them till only tomorrow then the hack is no good. If it takes them a week or more then it's a good short-term defense. If it takes them more than a month it's a really good short-term defense. It'll NOT last forever though. That's why I made it be a back-office-configurable thing.