1 marcdk Jan 11, 2008 19:06
3 marcdk Jan 11, 2008 20:54
ok, but that was not my question. =)
4 yabba Jan 12, 2008 00:10
No, but it was the correct answer ;)
¥
5 marcdk Jan 12, 2008 01:08
Ok, but would you please be so kind to tell me how to get Atom Feeds working on a 0.91 installation? =)
6 yabba Jan 12, 2008 01:26
yer gonna kill me but ... sure, upgrade ;)
The patch shows you which lines to remove ( preceded by - ) and which lines to add ( cunningly preceded by + ) .. there are ways to automate it but, like alternative charsets, I've never needed to know how. Google it, there's bound to be a million results ..... or just upgrade :roll:
¥
7 afwas Jan 12, 2008 01:38
0.91? Did you mention he should upgrade?
8 edb Jan 12, 2008 07:53
Friend you're gonna be an actual record holder here in a minute because I too recommend you take the time to upgrade to at least the 1.10.3 release. If not for us then do it for the subatomic particles that depend on us. And your blog of course.
Seriously, there are some known vulnerabilities out there on the 0.* generation. I don't recall which and when because honestly no one on the 'inside' here cares about 0.* anymore. If your version is secure (for now) that's cool, but support will always be "upgrade". Then there's the simple truth that 1103 is waaaay better than 0.anything at all aspects of being your blog engine.
Your record? You've gotten a combined 'experience' of over 8,700 posts gently prompting you to upgrade and *still* haven't said "I'll think about it ... okay I'll upgrade" :roll:
You really are running an obsolete version, the atom feed now runs 1.0 as standard.
¥