1 titssn Mar 28, 2008 18:28
3 titssn Mar 28, 2008 20:41
I don't know why when I choose the version at the time of creating the post it always say it's 1.10x.
John,
Thank you for the response and info. I will see what can be done about it.
4 edb Mar 28, 2008 20:43
There is a hack thing that goes something like this:
<img src="regular_link_to_malicious_web_site.html" />
Or some mechanism by which "they" create a nasty file and save it as ".jpg" but it is obviously not a jpg file but good old IE doesn't know or care so it treats it like an image and it does bad things. I don't understand how evil hackers do that stuff. All I know is not enabling images in comments is a smart move.
5 tilqicom Mar 28, 2008 20:43
TITSSN wrote:
I don't know why when I choose the version at the time of creating the post it always say it's 1.10x.
John,
Thank you for the response and info. I will see what can be done about it.
it's a nice bug we are already used to :lol: type it manually if u d like to :P
6 titssn Mar 28, 2008 20:52
EdB,
I tried that and it didn't work. Besides, I set my account to be the only one that can post this kind of code. All other account/groups have strict restrictions on them.
When I tried that code it gave me an error about illegal img tag.
7 edb Mar 28, 2008 21:35
Do you mean posting or commenting?
Anyone with posting permission in a blog should be able to include an image in a post, but no one under any circumstances has ever had permission to do an image in a comment. Comments being where malicious surfers might try to do harm yah?
I'm sure that this is a security issue
From formatting.php