Recent Topics

1 Oct 24, 2005 03:28    

Yeah, when I started a blog, what I was really thinking was how much time I wanted to spend defending my bandwidth from the automated scum referring hits.

Come on. What's the easy answer to the question - how do I get rid of these bandwidth spammers from referring crap to my blog -- so I'm not spending all of my time out here reading about 100 different methods which "almost" work?

Anyone?

2 Oct 24, 2005 03:43

wow, at the risk of worsening your already crappy mood,

1. bomb brazil and russia
2. firebomb spammers individually

--

Not sure what you are after -- you want an absolute solution to referer spam? Dont have a web site. Other answers that might apply:

http://forums.b2evolution.net/viewtopic.php?t=3764
http://forums.b2evolution.net/viewtopic.php?t=4876
http://forums.b2evolution.net/viewtopic.php?t=4512

--

this is topic'd as a feature request, its not one, im moving this.

3 Oct 24, 2005 03:53

I was being a bit direct in my question, knowing darn well that your answer is (unfortunately) the truth :) ...

But seriously -- I really don't care AT ALL about the stats that these abusers are triggering on my site. All I wanted was a nice blog, and now I have to manage the spam hits on a VERY regular basis.

Are the stats, including all spam, actually helping anyone? I doubt it. They're not good stats, as they are littered and overrun with garbage.

Why are they there? They really are useless. The idea of a blog is to ... uhm, I don't know ... BLOG! I spend more time managing spam than I actually do blogging on my own site (seriously)

Really? And that's good why? :>

4 Oct 24, 2005 04:05

nope, the stats are uselsss, remove them, I would, and did. trouble is the spammers dont know the difference.

I am pleased you took my response lightheartedly, honest.

Install kwa's (really ioerror's) bad behavior and fix up your htaccess using some of the rules in that one thread i posted that has my name in the topic. Your spam load will decrease dramatically.

5 Oct 24, 2005 04:56

sorry - you lost me :oops: ... i really don't understand what you just said. is "bad behavior" the name of a hack or something? if so, is it easy to find this somewhere? i ran a search for posts with your name in the subject, but the forums returned just too many posts (which didn't have your name) :). sorry -- can you clarify? perhaps some links in reference to what you mentioned?

i'm heading back into the corner to continue banging my head against the wall now 8|

6 Oct 24, 2005 05:16

BTW: i too am glad that you've taken my comments as tongue-in-cheek. i totally understand the nature of open source software, as i run the forums for phpWebSite (phpwsforums.com).

i was a bit taken by the huge amount of spam referrals that b2evolution brought to me. if i didn't own my hosting services, i would be getting rooked out of a ton of money for bandwidth right now. i'm sure there are users who are "paying" the price (literally) for these spam referral hoodlums.

good job.

thanks
--kevin

7 Oct 24, 2005 06:49

whoo wrote:

Not sure what you are after -- you want an absolute solution to referer spam? Dont have a web site. Other answers that might apply:

http://forums.b2evolution.net/viewtopic.php?t=3764
http://forums.b2evolution.net/viewtopic.php?t=4876
http://forums.b2evolution.net/viewtopic.php?t=4512

one of those is bad behavior, a port of the wordpress plugin by the same name. Its THE very best solution thus far on these forums for combatting spam, ioerror (the original coder) did a great job, and in fact the original for wordpress was just updated today.

One of those is my antispam .htaccess thread-- like ioerror, I like to get rid of the spam before it hits the blog or my logs. The other one is issaac's .htaccess thread (I think)

9 Oct 24, 2005 09:32

you linked to THIS thread, kwa

10 Oct 24, 2005 11:53

whoo wrote:

you linked to THIS thread, kwa

Sorry, it's fixed. I won't post anything without having slept the night before anymore.


Form is loading...